New Delhi, Sep 3 : One of the Muslim parties in the Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute on Tuesday submitted to the Supreme Court's five-judge Constitution bench that the stand of the other side, Nirmohi Akhara, has always been contradictory from the very beginning of the case. "The stand of the Nirmohi Akhara (One of the parties in the Ayodhya title suit) is always contradictory.
It says at times, the disputed site is from 300 years, at times 200 years or more than 150 years," Dr Rajeev Dhavan, senior lawyer appearing for the Muslim side, told the bench headed by Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi. A new flourish is added to pleadings of Hindu parties that the persons who brought down the mosque were miscreants and had nothing to do with the Hindus, Dhavan submitted. Up for consideration are a batch of appeals against the 2010 Allahabad High Court trifurcation of the 2.77 acres disputed site at Ayodhya. More UNI